<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why QRP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kb6nu.com/why-qrp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kb6nu.com/why-qrp/</link>
	<description>Having fun with amateur radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan KB6NU</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/why-qrp/#comment-63445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan KB6NU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 20:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/why-qrp/#comment-63445</guid>
		<description>Good point. I had a similar idea a couple of years ago. See http://kb6nu.com/im-all-for-qrp-but/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I had a similar idea a couple of years ago. See <a href="http://kb6nu.com/im-all-for-qrp-but/" rel="nofollow">http://kb6nu.com/im-all-for-qrp-but/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bullington</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/why-qrp/#comment-63250</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Bullington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/why-qrp/#comment-63250</guid>
		<description>While I have nothing against QRP and think it is a wonderful addition to the hobby etc. I do have a bone to pick with #1 in the above list: &quot;High power is too easy.&quot; Hmmm...I usually run 80-90 watts into a 380 foot loop and get pretty good reports. Seems to me....maybe it&#039;s the cynicism born of old age....when I work a QRP station (at least 3 or 4 times a week) its me doing all the work, twiddling knobs trying to fight the QSB and QRN and pull that faint little 3-5 watt signal in while the QRP station gets armchair copy from me! I&#039;m always suspicious of any claim that something is &quot;too easy&quot;!! Too easy for who, is the question.
                                           With tongue mostly in cheek, Andy W1AWB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I have nothing against QRP and think it is a wonderful addition to the hobby etc. I do have a bone to pick with #1 in the above list: &#8220;High power is too easy.&#8221; Hmmm&#8230;I usually run 80-90 watts into a 380 foot loop and get pretty good reports. Seems to me&#8230;.maybe it&#8217;s the cynicism born of old age&#8230;.when I work a QRP station (at least 3 or 4 times a week) its me doing all the work, twiddling knobs trying to fight the QSB and QRN and pull that faint little 3-5 watt signal in while the QRP station gets armchair copy from me! I&#8217;m always suspicious of any claim that something is &#8220;too easy&#8221;!! Too easy for who, is the question.<br />
                                           With tongue mostly in cheek, Andy W1AWB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  kb6nu.com/why-qrp/feed/ ) in 0.61561 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:41 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 13th, 2012 at 8:41 am UTC -->
