<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Success with RUMTrol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kb6nu.com/success-with-rumtrol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kb6nu.com/success-with-rumtrol/</link>
	<description>My personal adventures in amateur radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan KB6NU</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/success-with-rumtrol/comment-page-1/#comment-300663</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan KB6NU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=1275#comment-300663</guid>
		<description>The URL for the Ham-Mac mailing list is http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The URL for the Ham-Mac mailing list is <a href="http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac" rel="nofollow">http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ham-mac</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/success-with-rumtrol/comment-page-1/#comment-300646</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=1275#comment-300646</guid>
		<description>Actually,that doesn&#039;t surprise me.  With today&#039;s computers... and the Mac in particular, they are so fast and expect everything else to talk with such speed, I would imagine that getting a computer to recognize 300 baud would take some interesting programming.  300 baud is pretty darn slow, I know when I got my first &quot;modem&quot; back in the day, I could read the text on the screen faster than the computer recieved it.  For a computer running at gigahertz on a port designed for 800+ megabits a second to listen for 300 BITS a second is pretty darn slow.  Maybe I&#039;m way off base, but I know with some of my music gear, that&#039;s the case.  The lower baud rate settings just don&#039;t work.

I&#039;m interested in the MAC ham mailing list.  Didn&#039;t know one existed.  Can you hook me up?  Pretty please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually,that doesn&#8217;t surprise me.  With today&#8217;s computers&#8230; and the Mac in particular, they are so fast and expect everything else to talk with such speed, I would imagine that getting a computer to recognize 300 baud would take some interesting programming.  300 baud is pretty darn slow, I know when I got my first &#8220;modem&#8221; back in the day, I could read the text on the screen faster than the computer recieved it.  For a computer running at gigahertz on a port designed for 800+ megabits a second to listen for 300 BITS a second is pretty darn slow.  Maybe I&#8217;m way off base, but I know with some of my music gear, that&#8217;s the case.  The lower baud rate settings just don&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in the MAC ham mailing list.  Didn&#8217;t know one existed.  Can you hook me up?  Pretty please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
