Comments on: Let’s Support the Emergency Amateur Radio Interference Protection Act of 2007 http://kb6nu.com/lets-support-the-emergency-amateur-radio-interference-protection-act-of-2007/ My personal adventures in amateur radio Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:08:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Jim http://kb6nu.com/lets-support-the-emergency-amateur-radio-interference-protection-act-of-2007/#comment-119302 Jim Thu, 31 May 2007 05:40:01 +0000 http://kb6nu.com/lets-support-the-emergency-amateur-radio-interference-protection-act-of-2007/#comment-119302 I don't think the bill protects us; it requests the FCC do a study and report back to Congress. [Not that that's a bad thing!] A quick search at ARRL.org turns up: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/01/18/101/?nc=1 The ARRL article links to Thomas (Library of Congress) which appears to have the complete text of the bill: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.462: Anyway, at the very least letting our House members know we care about the issue couldn't possibly hurt. However HR 462 does not seem to be the "final solution." That would seem to require a separate bill (perhaps after the HR 462 study has been reported to Congress). 73, Jim N9GTM I don’t think the bill protects us; it requests the FCC do a study and
report back to Congress. [Not that that's a bad thing!]

A quick search at ARRL.org turns up:
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/01/18/101/?nc=1

The ARRL article links to Thomas (Library of Congress) which appears
to have the complete text of the bill:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.462:

Anyway, at the very least letting our House members know we care
about the issue couldn’t possibly hurt. However HR 462 does not
seem to be the “final solution.” That would seem to require a separate
bill (perhaps after the HR 462 study has been reported to Congress).

73,
Jim N9GTM

]]>