<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for KB6NU&#039;s Ham Radio Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kb6nu.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kb6nu.com</link>
	<description>Having fun with amateur radio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paper calls for emcomm digital networks by Dave N8SBE</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/paper-calls-for-emcomm-digital-network/#comment-336995</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave N8SBE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4569#comment-336995</guid>
		<description>If you ask Jay, WB8TKL, he will point out that we already have such a digital network.  The entire state of Michigan is covered.  See: http://www.mi-drg.org/

He has demonstrated this at the last several ARROW field days, using the network to send our field day messages to the section mananger, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ask Jay, WB8TKL, he will point out that we already have such a digital network.  The entire state of Michigan is covered.  See: <a href="http://www.mi-drg.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mi-drg.org/</a></p>
<p>He has demonstrated this at the last several ARROW field days, using the network to send our field day messages to the section mananger, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A wake-up call for amateur radio? by Dave N8SBE</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/a-wake-up-call-for-amateur-radio/#comment-336992</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave N8SBE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4558#comment-336992</guid>
		<description>The amateur radio VHF/UHF FM service (and expectations) has changed over the years.  Those that used repeaters since their inception are incredulous that no one answers when they call. The rest just shrug and dial for assistance with their cell phones.

So where&#039;s the real answer?  Possibly somewhere in the middle.  Amateur radio is a volunteer service, and just like any volunteers, we don&#039;t appreciate being berated for not responding to what might be considered unreasonable demands of others -- unreasonable being in the mind of the volunteer, and no one else can make that decision for him/her.

It&#039;s dangerous to assume that anyone can demand that a repeater be monitored 24/7 x 365 by volunteers.  Where do the demands end, and the volunteers&#039; time and willingness to serve start?  No one should be shamed into volunteering for any reason, no matter how noble it seems in the mind of the demander(s).  That&#039;s the quickest way I know of to drive volunteers away in droves.  If it happens, great.  If it doesn&#039;t, no one has the right to criticize.

When I was young (much younger than I care to admit) I once tried pleading and berating an empty repeater for what I considered was rightfully mine -- directions to some place I was trying to drive to in the local city I was living in.  It annoyed me no end that no one was responding mid-day, becuase I just KNEW that they were all &#039;keeping quiet&#039;.  Looking back on that, I am still quite embarrased about the whole thing, and I&#039;m certain that I sounded like a flaming idiot.

Bring a cell phone and emergency supplies on road trips.  A ham radio is certainly nice to have, but I no longer assume that everyone is waiting with bated breath to talk to me, or to offer whatever assistance they can, in response to my distress calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amateur radio VHF/UHF FM service (and expectations) has changed over the years.  Those that used repeaters since their inception are incredulous that no one answers when they call. The rest just shrug and dial for assistance with their cell phones.</p>
<p>So where&#8217;s the real answer?  Possibly somewhere in the middle.  Amateur radio is a volunteer service, and just like any volunteers, we don&#8217;t appreciate being berated for not responding to what might be considered unreasonable demands of others &#8212; unreasonable being in the mind of the volunteer, and no one else can make that decision for him/her.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s dangerous to assume that anyone can demand that a repeater be monitored 24/7 x 365 by volunteers.  Where do the demands end, and the volunteers&#8217; time and willingness to serve start?  No one should be shamed into volunteering for any reason, no matter how noble it seems in the mind of the demander(s).  That&#8217;s the quickest way I know of to drive volunteers away in droves.  If it happens, great.  If it doesn&#8217;t, no one has the right to criticize.</p>
<p>When I was young (much younger than I care to admit) I once tried pleading and berating an empty repeater for what I considered was rightfully mine &#8212; directions to some place I was trying to drive to in the local city I was living in.  It annoyed me no end that no one was responding mid-day, becuase I just KNEW that they were all &#8216;keeping quiet&#8217;.  Looking back on that, I am still quite embarrased about the whole thing, and I&#8217;m certain that I sounded like a flaming idiot.</p>
<p>Bring a cell phone and emergency supplies on road trips.  A ham radio is certainly nice to have, but I no longer assume that everyone is waiting with bated breath to talk to me, or to offer whatever assistance they can, in response to my distress calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ham radio ops playing basketball? by Dan KB6NU</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/ham-radio-ops-playing-basketball/#comment-336991</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan KB6NU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4574#comment-336991</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a golfer, but I am a bowler, and we have at least two other ham bowlers here in Ann Arbor, and I bet that I can twist their arms to bowl with us. I&#039;ll email you and we can work out some details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a golfer, but I am a bowler, and we have at least two other ham bowlers here in Ann Arbor, and I bet that I can twist their arms to bowl with us. I&#8217;ll email you and we can work out some details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ham radio ops playing basketball? by Larry Koziel K8MU</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/ham-radio-ops-playing-basketball/#comment-336990</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Koziel K8MU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4574#comment-336990</guid>
		<description>What timing!

Just last night at Hazel Park ARC meeting, I tossed out an idea to the membership about a possible off-air club activity. My idea was to get together a team of either golfers or bowlers (or both), and challenge some of the other local radio clubs to a match. I&#039;m sure the results wouldn&#039;t be so newsworthy as to catch the attention of someone on the other side of the globe, but it might be fun to hear the members with some friendly smack talk on the local repeater in anticipation of winning bragging rights over a rival club.

Any takers in Ann Arbor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What timing!</p>
<p>Just last night at Hazel Park ARC meeting, I tossed out an idea to the membership about a possible off-air club activity. My idea was to get together a team of either golfers or bowlers (or both), and challenge some of the other local radio clubs to a match. I&#8217;m sure the results wouldn&#8217;t be so newsworthy as to catch the attention of someone on the other side of the globe, but it might be fun to hear the members with some friendly smack talk on the local repeater in anticipation of winning bragging rights over a rival club.</p>
<p>Any takers in Ann Arbor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A wake-up call for amateur radio? by Bob K0NR</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/a-wake-up-call-for-amateur-radio/#comment-336983</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob K0NR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4558#comment-336983</guid>
		<description>Should we encourage hams to monitor their local repeater and 146.52 MHz? Yes
Should we expect 24/7 coverage? No
Should we complain about a ham radio issue by writing a letter to a newspaper? No (this is really dumb).

73, Bob K0NR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we encourage hams to monitor their local repeater and 146.52 MHz? Yes<br />
Should we expect 24/7 coverage? No<br />
Should we complain about a ham radio issue by writing a letter to a newspaper? No (this is really dumb).</p>
<p>73, Bob K0NR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A wake-up call for amateur radio? by Phil-K4NE</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/a-wake-up-call-for-amateur-radio/#comment-336977</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil-K4NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4558#comment-336977</guid>
		<description>Situations such as this always catch my attention.  Although I have called for and received help a number of times on local VHF/UHF repeaters, I&#039;ve had a similar experience many years ago - pre-mobile phone era - that make me sensitive to anyone asking for help.  

It was a January afternoon in an upper mid-west state and I was on a long distance cross-country trip.  Temps were well below zero and the wind was blowing snow.   My engine suddenly failed.  After calling for assistance on several local 2m repeaters with no response, I found several locals chatting.  I broke in and described my situation.  One of the hams said he was blind and could not help.  The other told me to try another repeater, one that I had already tried with no response.  Astounded, I pondered my situation for 15 minutes and began making some hard decisions on self-preservation.  Fortunately, a highway patrol soon happened to drive by going the opposite direction.  A ride was offered to a nearby city where I found help.

UHF/VHF repeater use seems to be waning in many parts of the US.  Monitoring repeaters 24/7 may be an honorable goal but may not be realistic, especially in rural areas.  I do believe, however, that hams can and should do a better job of monitoring and offering assistance when needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Situations such as this always catch my attention.  Although I have called for and received help a number of times on local VHF/UHF repeaters, I&#8217;ve had a similar experience many years ago &#8211; pre-mobile phone era &#8211; that make me sensitive to anyone asking for help.  </p>
<p>It was a January afternoon in an upper mid-west state and I was on a long distance cross-country trip.  Temps were well below zero and the wind was blowing snow.   My engine suddenly failed.  After calling for assistance on several local 2m repeaters with no response, I found several locals chatting.  I broke in and described my situation.  One of the hams said he was blind and could not help.  The other told me to try another repeater, one that I had already tried with no response.  Astounded, I pondered my situation for 15 minutes and began making some hard decisions on self-preservation.  Fortunately, a highway patrol soon happened to drive by going the opposite direction.  A ride was offered to a nearby city where I found help.</p>
<p>UHF/VHF repeater use seems to be waning in many parts of the US.  Monitoring repeaters 24/7 may be an honorable goal but may not be realistic, especially in rural areas.  I do believe, however, that hams can and should do a better job of monitoring and offering assistance when needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A wake-up call for amateur radio? by Lisa</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/a-wake-up-call-for-amateur-radio/#comment-336968</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4558#comment-336968</guid>
		<description>Did you not prepare for travel in severe midwest/winter weather? provisions and amenities for such a situation? Cell phone? Did you tell other family members of your travel plans or travel route? you can&#039;t blame your thoughlessness on others, nor expect others to come to your rescue just because you were thoughtless and unprepared. What a shame people like you reflect so poorly on HAM ops!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you not prepare for travel in severe midwest/winter weather? provisions and amenities for such a situation? Cell phone? Did you tell other family members of your travel plans or travel route? you can&#8217;t blame your thoughlessness on others, nor expect others to come to your rescue just because you were thoughtless and unprepared. What a shame people like you reflect so poorly on HAM ops!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A wake-up call for amateur radio? by Johnny KD5LWU</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/a-wake-up-call-for-amateur-radio/#comment-336965</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny KD5LWU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4558#comment-336965</guid>
		<description>I have drove across the United States listening and making calls  on 146.52 and only talked to 3 hams on .52 in 4 days of travel. I even tried a number of repeaters with no answer. I was appalled! I listen to my repeater from the time I get up in the morning until I go to bed about 2:00 A.M. We also need people to list to our national calling channel 146.52</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have drove across the United States listening and making calls  on 146.52 and only talked to 3 hams on .52 in 4 days of travel. I even tried a number of repeaters with no answer. I was appalled! I listen to my repeater from the time I get up in the morning until I go to bed about 2:00 A.M. We also need people to list to our national calling channel 146.52</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A wake-up call for amateur radio? by Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/a-wake-up-call-for-amateur-radio/#comment-336958</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4558#comment-336958</guid>
		<description>I wrote a more detailed response on eham, but I can&#039;t disagree with Mr. Kernaich more. Amateur Radio is not an emergency service, and it is inappropriate to call for amateurs to be press-ganged into monitoring the amateur bands at all hours for emergency traffic.

This rant is made all the more absurd given that Mr. Kernaich acknowledges, though only in the briefest of mentions, that the proper emergency services (namely the police) did respond just as expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a more detailed response on eham, but I can&#8217;t disagree with Mr. Kernaich more. Amateur Radio is not an emergency service, and it is inappropriate to call for amateurs to be press-ganged into monitoring the amateur bands at all hours for emergency traffic.</p>
<p>This rant is made all the more absurd given that Mr. Kernaich acknowledges, though only in the briefest of mentions, that the proper emergency services (namely the police) did respond just as expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yaesu thinks the future of ham radio is digital by Dan KB6NU</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/yaesu-thinks-the-future-of-ham-radio-is-digital/#comment-336956</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan KB6NU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/?p=4437#comment-336956</guid>
		<description>Excellent comment, James. I&#039;ve often wondered why someone hasn&#039;t incorporated more cellphone technology into ham radio equipment.  I guess that maybe the development costs are too high. That might be an opportunity for some ambitious, young hams, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comment, James. I&#8217;ve often wondered why someone hasn&#8217;t incorporated more cellphone technology into ham radio equipment.  I guess that maybe the development costs are too high. That might be an opportunity for some ambitious, young hams, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  kb6nu.com/comments/feed/ ) in 0.88748 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:25 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 10:25 pm UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  kb6nu.com/comments/feed/ ) in 0.00061 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 8:44 am UTC. -->
