<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Project Off the Workbench and Into Operation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kb6nu.com/another-project-off-the-workbench-and-into-operation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kb6nu.com/another-project-off-the-workbench-and-into-operation/</link>
	<description>My personal adventures in amateur radio</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan KB6NU</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/another-project-off-the-workbench-and-into-operation/#comment-44480</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan KB6NU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/another-project-off-the-workbench-and-into-operation/#comment-44480</guid>
		<description>Hi, Al--

Thanks for your comment. I like the shoebox prototyping technique. Seems to me that it would be easier to construct something using this technique than the Manhattan technique. I'm going to have to start saving shoebox tops and give it a try. 

It occurs to me that it might be worthwhile to build a "shoebox" from single-sided PCB material. This would have two advantages over the shoebox top: It would be mechanically sturdier, and the copper side would provide a nice ground plane. I'm going to have to work on this idea a bit more.

73, Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Al&#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. I like the shoebox prototyping technique. Seems to me that it would be easier to construct something using this technique than the Manhattan technique. I&#8217;m going to have to start saving shoebox tops and give it a try. </p>
<p>It occurs to me that it might be worthwhile to build a &#8220;shoebox&#8221; from single-sided PCB material. This would have two advantages over the shoebox top: It would be mechanically sturdier, and the copper side would provide a nice ground plane. I&#8217;m going to have to work on this idea a bit more.</p>
<p>73, Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WD5GNR</title>
		<link>http://kb6nu.com/another-project-off-the-workbench-and-into-operation/#comment-44451</link>
		<dc:creator>WD5GNR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kb6nu.com/another-project-off-the-workbench-and-into-operation/#comment-44451</guid>
		<description>Enjoy the blog. I built a nice regen once using my shoebox technique (see http://www.hotsolder.com/articles/index.php?page=foil-prototyping). Really handy for that sort of thing. One transistor, and a 35mm film can coil.

73 de WD5GNR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy the blog. I built a nice regen once using my shoebox technique (see <a href="http://www.hotsolder.com/articles/index.php?page=foil-prototyping" rel="nofollow">http://www.hotsolder.com/articles/index.php?page=foil-prototyping</a>). Really handy for that sort of thing. One transistor, and a 35mm film can coil.</p>
<p>73 de WD5GNR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
