Comments on: An Interesting QSO http://kb6nu.com/an-interesting-qso/ My personal adventures in amateur radio Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:19:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Dan KB6NU http://kb6nu.com/an-interesting-qso/#comment-163303 Dan KB6NU Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:57:36 +0000 http://kb6nu.com/an-interesting-qso/#comment-163303 <i>Just got this email from K7JNX....Dan</i> Hi Dan, I just wanted to follow up on what I mentioned during our CW QSO the other evening. I had mentioned that I remembered reading some comments on the MixW discussion group about the lackluster quality of MixW's CW capabilities (compared to its good performance on the digital soundcard modes). You can see that discussion at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mixw/msearch?query=cwget&submit=Search&charset=ISO-8859-1. Several comments rave about CWGet: http://www.dxsoft.com/micwget.htm. One review is at http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1491. I haven't done so yet, but I intend to download CWGET and see how it does compared to MixW. Looking forward to seeing you on the air again! Best regards, Howard K7JNX Just got this email from K7JNX….Dan

Hi Dan,

I just wanted to follow up on what I mentioned during our CW QSO the other evening. I had mentioned that I remembered reading some comments on the MixW discussion group about the lackluster quality of MixW’s CW capabilities (compared to its good performance on the digital soundcard modes). You can see that discussion at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mixw/msearch?query=cwget&submit=Search&charset=ISO-8859-1.

Several comments rave about CWGet: http://www.dxsoft.com/micwget.htm. One review is at http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1491.

I haven’t done so yet, but I intend to download CWGET and see how it does compared to MixW.

Looking forward to seeing you on the air again!

Best regards,

Howard K7JNX

]]>